Consider an asset’s log-return series , where is the expected return and is a zero-mean white noise. The total log-return between date and date is then naturally defined as:The standard definition of the -day ahead of a position in this asset is the 1% or 5% quantile of the return distribution for . V-Lab’s long run risk measures use simulation based methods to calculate the at horizons of and .
One way to calculate is to simulate future realizations of the return process and use the resulting simulations to calculate . For both of the models prescribed in the models section of the documentation, a volatility model is fit to historical data on each day. The resulting model is then simulated ahead 10,000 times, for a horizon of 1-year in advance. All simulations are bootstrapped - that is historical shocks to the return process are drawn at random to simulate each path. is then calculated using both the 1% and 5% quantile of the 10,000 simulated return paths. Finally, logarithmic returns are converted back to arithmetic returns.
For a given day , the following model is fit to historical data:
For more details on estimation refer to the GJR-GARCH section of the volatility analysis in V-Lab. Estimation delivers the parameters , , as well as a historical variance series . Subsequently, a historical series of residuals, or shocks, is easily computed by . Using this historical residual series and the estimated parameters, 10,000 future return paths rt,t+k are simulated to deliver a measure of .
Engle, Robert F., The Risk that Risk Will Change. Journal Of Investment Management (JOIM), Fourth Quarter 2009. https://www.joim.com/article/the-risk-that-risk-will-change/
Engle, R. F. and J. G. Rangel, 2008. The Spline-GARCH Model for Low-Frequency Volatility and Its Global Macroeconomic Causes. Review of Financial Studies 21(3): 1187-1222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40056848
Glosten, L. R., R. Jagannathan, and D. E. Runkle, 1993. On The Relation between The Expected Value and The Volatility of Nominal Excess Return on stocks. Journal of Finance 48: 1779-1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
Zakoian, J. M., 1994. Threshold Heteroscedastic Models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18: 931-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(94)90039-6